The Edgewater Project

Construction is transformation and transformation takes time. Everything we rely on in daily life - clean water, safe roads, streetlights, storm protection and accessible public spaces exists because of construction. The Edgewater Street Project is Mahone Bay’s biggest capital project this year and a once-in-a-generation opportunity to transform our town.

This project will upgrade vital services, extend water and sewer along Edgewater to Kedy’s Landing, eliminate straight pipes, protect our harbour, revitalize public spaces, improve safety and accessibility, support active transportation, and help fight coastal erosion while revitalizing a waterfront wildlife corridor. In short, it’s a major step toward a cleaner, greener, and more connected Mahone Bay.

With a total budget of $14.9 million, strong provincial and federal partnerships mean every Town dollar is leveraging nearly two more. Our 35% investment is drawing over $10 million in outside funding - proof of the value and importance of this project.

Construction is transformation and transformation takes time. Everything we rely on in daily life - clean water, safe roads, streetlights, storm protection and accessible public spaces exists because of construction. The Edgewater Street Project is Mahone Bay’s biggest capital project this year and a once-in-a-generation opportunity to transform our town.

This project will upgrade vital services, extend water and sewer along Edgewater to Kedy’s Landing, eliminate straight pipes, protect our harbour, revitalize public spaces, improve safety and accessibility, support active transportation, and help fight coastal erosion while revitalizing a waterfront wildlife corridor. In short, it’s a major step toward a cleaner, greener, and more connected Mahone Bay.

With a total budget of $14.9 million, strong provincial and federal partnerships mean every Town dollar is leveraging nearly two more. Our 35% investment is drawing over $10 million in outside funding - proof of the value and importance of this project.

Got a question?

Please check the FAQs before posting a question, you may find it answered there!

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • I have noticed, in the 3 years since the Living Shoreline Project was completed, that the plants expected to cover the intertidal zone behind the rock sill have shown little or no progress in doing so. I am not a botanist but am familiar with sediments and I suspect it is the "sand" used that lacks the make-up to allow the plants to thrive. If I'm not mistaken, the material used was what quarry operators term crusher dust. This is composed largely of ground-up granite and is of little nutrient value for the vegetation, especially the newly introduced. By contrast the vegetation on the bank above the intertidal section is well established having grown in the existing shoreline soil. So, is a different intertidal fill (more nutrient rich) in the extension of the Living Shoreline going to be used instead of the crusher dust?

    Gregg (geologist) asked 20 days ago

    Thanks so much for your interest in the project, we always appreciate when people reach out! Our partners at Coastal Action have confirmed that the plants are actually doing really well. With this kind of tidal wetland installation, it’s completely normal that they don’t fill in all the open space right away. What we’re seeing is exactly what we hoped for: the plants have survived, they’re spreading at their bases, and they’re producing seed, which is a great sign that things are progressing as expected. These systems take several years to really fill out, and everything is right on track with the projected timelines.

    Coastal Action's research partners at TransCoastal Adaptations at SMU have been closely monitoring the site, and a couple of Master’s students are currently focusing on the vegetation side of things. The sediment used in the demonstration site was chosen specifically for these specialized plants, and we’ve learned a lot from that process. Those lessons have helped the Coastal Action team refine the sediment specifications for the expansion site now under construction: mostly tweaks to particle size and shape. If you’re nearby, you might notice that the sediment looks different this time: Coastal Action shared a photo of it on their social media recently. The nutrient makeup of the sediment was also selected to support the plants’ needs.

    If you’re curious to dig a little deeper, there’s a year-one monitoring summary available on our Coastal Action's project website. It doesn’t focus heavily on vegetation, but it still offers a good overview of how things are progressing. Let us know if you have any other questions, our partners at Coastal Action are always happy to chat about the project!

  • A month ago Niemand asked the question regarding the "waterfront wildlife corridor" and I wish to follow up on that and in particular the concept of the protective rock sills. In an information meeting on the Living Shoreline Project (LSP) several years ago, I was told by the presenter that the rock sill was not going to be continued beyond the LSP because the harbour bottom composition could not structurally support a rock sill. The promotional video only shows it extending as far as the church parking lots so I assume this is the one hundred metre extension of the LSP. In the 3D Wave Design video the LSP is shown extending down to Keddys Landing at the head of the bay. Which version is current?

    Gregg (geologist) asked 21 days ago

    Thank you for your question. The promotional video is most current. The Living Shoreline stops at the end of the church parking lots on Edgewater because the harbour bottom past that point cannot hold a rock sill safely. A 2024 CBCL geotechnical study drilled into the seafloor and found deep layers of soft sediment. Replacing this with stronger material would be too costly and too disruptive. For more details, see the Mahone Bay Living Shoreline Geotechnical Report under Documents: Flood Mitigation Measures on this site. 

  • Is the pedestrian bridge still happening?

    Niemand asked about 1 month ago

    Thank you for your question. Due to budget considerations, the pedestrian bridge was not included in the current phase of work. However, it remains a future possibility. In CBCL’s 2016 study, a second phase of work is planned for the Ernst Brook retaining walls, and the pedestrian bridge is expected to be included in the conceptual design for Phase II, pending available funding. 

  • I appreciate your responsiveness to questions. You say "The two-lane design provides clear separation for both pedestrian and wheeled traffic, and accommodates users passing each other with ease." You do not say how this will work. Am I correct in saying that the solid yellow line running the length of the asphalt will create the two lanes and effect lane control, i.e., traffic must stay in its (presumably right-hand) lane. If so, who will create this rule of the road, how will it be created, and how will it be implemented? Or, do we assume everyone implicitly understands the role of a solid yellow line and will respect it? Either way the design is for a second, parallel, road, which is an unfortunate look and environmentally questionable. You say in response to Mary Forbes that the multi-use trail is to "enhance active transportation connections." I do not understand where the connections are or how they will work. Take cyclists coming down Clearland Road from the Dynamite Trail for example. How do they access the trail and, having entered the trail, where do they exit the trail to bike routes? The way I understand it those traveling south will have to cross Highway # 3 twice and exit onto the highway, which has no bike lanes.

    Niemand asked about 2 months ago

    The Blue Route Hubs Bikeway Feasibility Study is a really great resource and worth a read if you are keen to understand the influencing factors for new active transportation routes in Nova Scotia. Approaching Mahone Bay on Trunk 3 - The Lighthouse Route, bicycle route network planning highlights Edgewater and Main Streets as forming a transportation spine for the community. The 50 k/p/h speed limit on Edgewater Street is considered a barrier for recreational cyclists. With Edgewater and Main Street connecting services and shopping areas between Kedy's Landing and Edgewater/Main as well as being the main route connecting Blockhouse and Oakland and Mader's Cove coastal routes, any new off-road trail development that runs the length of Edgewater was going to align with active transportation and accessibility goals. The number of resources, strategies and policies that exist globally, nationally and provincially to support active transportation and enhanced connectivity are too numerous to post, but "best practice" will inform code of ethics, trail etiquette and rules for use, including yielding, safe speeds, and how to pass. Also, there are points of access along the length of the trail with marked crosswalks enhancing connection points across Edgewater Street. Landscape plans under documents on this site will give you an idea of softscape, picnic and resting areas, and points of accessibility along the waterfront trail.

  • I submitted an email many months ago expressing my reservations regarding the then proposed walking/riding trail. To date, I have received no feedback, I have now reviewed the updated plans. I don't believe my concerns have been adequately addressed, and I now have additional ones. 1. I strongly believe the trail should not be multi-use. It should be restricted to pedestrians and motorized disability vehicles. Allowing regular cyclists is a recipe for serious problems. 2. Asphalt is too heat reflective - a problem for dogs. 3. The proposed median between between Edgewater Street (which is part of the highway system, after all) is too narrow. Unless there is fencing or perhaps high concrete planters, there is not enough protection for pedestrians from vehicles travelling at 60+ kph. 4. I don't believe planting trees and shrubs on the water side of the trail makes sense. This would not only obstruct the view (the 'raison d'etre' of the trail?) but could potentially weaken the seawall. Rather, the plantings should be reserved for the median. I am absolutely not against this project, but I would hate to see funds expended to no good end. Yours truly, Mary Forbes

    MuddyWaters asked 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comments. Please find the Staff Report (filed under Project Design documents on this site) requested by Council on September 25, 2025 to consult with project engineers concerning design options for the multi-use (pedestrian and bicycle) trail component on the Edgewater Street project.

    The multi-use waterfront trail was designed through detailed engineering, planning, and accessibility studies, and guided by the Blue Route Hubs Bikeway Feasibility Study to enhance active transportation connections. Its two-lane design safely accommodates pedestrians, mobility devices, and recreational cyclists, supporting inclusive and sustainable mobility for all users.

    Asphalt was selected for its firm, stable, and slip-resistant surface, meeting accessibility standards while providing year-round durability and easier winter maintenance. Alternatives like crusher dust and boardwalks are unsuitable due to erosion, accessibility limitations, and maintenance/clearing requirements and costs. The raised berm and chosen trail in the detailed design meet best practices for safety, accessibility, shoreline protection and flood resilience, and long-term upkeep. Dog walking along the trail may be best in the morning and early evening, or on grassy landscaped areas adjacent to the trail.  

    A one-meter curbed median with planting beds separates the roadway from the three-meter raised waterfront trail, which includes post-and-rope guardrails, and handrails in select areas. This design replaces unsafe conditions where pedestrians previously walked directly beside 50 km/h traffic with no sidewalk, significantly improving safety and comfort. For further detail, please see the Landscaping Plans under documents/Landscaping on this site for medians, elevations, and softscaping. The Flood Prevention and Shoreline Enhancement study is a useful resource, too. 

    Planting beds along the median, and a vegetated rock embankment on the waterside to stabilize the new flood mitigation structures, will restore some natural habitat. These native plantings enhance shoreline resilience and invite wildlife back into the revitalized coastal landscape, creating both ecological and visual benefits for the community.

  • So, the wildlife corridor is just another name for the short extension to the living shoreline, right? About the response to the question about bicycles on the trail, how will the two lane accommodation of recreational cyclists and pedestrians work? Will joggers, scooters, skateboards, strollers, rollerblades, wheelchairs, motorized wheelchairs, dog walkers and electric bike cyclists all be allowed to enjoy the trail?

    Niemand asked about 2 months ago

    The extension of the Living Shoreline, yes - also a wildlife corridor - expands a 60-meter pilot project into a 160-meter tidal wetland on the Mahone Bay waterfront. You may find the expansion well-illustrated and explained on Coastal Action's project website. 

    In answer to your questions on the multi-use trail. The trail has been carefully designed to safely accommodate a wide range of users while maintaining full accessibility and a positive experience for everyone. Accessibility and active transportation have been key values in the development of the trail since the project's inception. The two-lane design provides clear separation for both pedestrian and wheeled traffic, and accommodates users passing each other with ease. To ensure safety and comfort for all, design features such as surface markings, good sightlines, adequate trail width, rest areas, and consistent surfacing will further support safe, shared use. The two-lane system is not about capacity, it’s about creating a shared, inclusive, and accessible route where everyone, regardless of ability or mode, can move comfortably and safely.

     



  • Your picture on the website cover doesn’t show bicycles. Is that correct only a pedway?

    Me asked 2 months ago

    The multiuse trail linking Kedy’s Landing to downtown combines shoreline protection with active transportation, creating a raised and flood resilient, widened and paved accessible route that connects key areas of town and supports year-round walking and cycling. Guided by a decade of engineering, planning and accessibility studies; aligned with the Blue Route Hubs Bikeway Feasibility Study led by Bicycle Nova Scotia; and launched by multiple Federal and Provincial funding agreements, it features a two-lane design to safely accommodate pedestrians and recreational cyclists alike advancing Mahone Bay’s vision for a safe, connected, and sustainable active transportation network. 

  • When will traffic be open with two lanes again.

    R857 asked 2 months ago

    Once testing of new water, sewer and electrical infrastructure is complete in early December, a basecoat of asphalt will be applied from Parish Street to Kedy’s Landing, followed by the final topcoat across all of Edgewater Street. The newly resurfaced roadway will reopen to two-lane traffic by mid-December, delivering upgraded infrastructure and improved access.The project timeline on this page provides more detail on the construction workplan.

  • The Edgewater Project description says that the project will revitalize "a waterfront wildlife corridor." Please explain what the wildlife corridor consists of, what wildlife it serves and how both the corridor and wildlife species will be revitalized.

    Neimand asked 2 months ago

    The 100-meter Living Shoreline expansion to the existing 60-meter Living Shoreline, created in partnership with Coastal Action, will restore and protect vital coastal habitat along Edgewater. By combining salt marsh conditions, natural vegetation with protective rock sills, it will stabilize the shoreline, enhance tidal wetland health, and create a thriving refuge for birds and marine life. Not intended for human use, this protected wildlife corridor will feature interpretive signage to educate visitors about wetland rejuvenation and the return of native species to this revitalized salt marsh ecosystem.

Page last updated: 17 Nov 2025, 12:24 PM